but that they both addressed me as Mireman. One of them was Sir William Wiseman who therefore called me with regard by his acquaintance.
Our natural money to the amount of the sum was under the impression that I paid her the whole amount on that occasion when I afterwards went there. I put the money in my pocket and went with the express purpose of paying.
Attorney General here asks "Who were the other persons present with you on that occasion?" In reply to which In Hearn repeats "Booth and Sir William Wiseman".
In Hearn then continues. I had already written to Booth to ask him for a statement of what took place on that occasion, but I have not yet received an answer.
In Hearn having no further statement to make, his brother puts to him the following questions:
1. In a letter dated the 12th, you state that this Maxwell was acquainted with you prior to this occasion?
I believe that he was, but I cannot state positively.
*
į
but that they both addeford me as
Mireman. One of
then
hillam
Sir William 246
Wiseman who therefore called me Wilt regard
by his
Ꮽ .
Our natuk
monery
to the amount of the
was under the impression that
I paid her the whole amount on
Itu or
casion when I afterwards went there. I put-
Uu
money
in
my pocket- and went with the express pumpurs of paying.
Attorney Jeneral here arts" "Who dich
the other persons present-
you
Nati were
that occasion with
"you"? in reps to which In Hearn repeatsTM In= Booth & Sir William Wiseman":
In Hearse then continues. I han already writ. ten to bootte to ask him for a statement of what took place that- occasion, but I hav
not yet receind as answere.
$
In Heams having no further statement to make This brethren puts to him the following prestons
1. In a letter dated then 12 heb
Your Tale thrat this
Maxwell was with
tion?
Wrm-an
acquaintect
you prior to this
frca --
I belien that-
The was, but I cannot state pro sitively
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.